Comparison

Hyperfox order automation vs Traditional OCR tools

Understanding the difference between text extraction and order automation.

OCR tools help digitise documents. Hyperfox automates B2B orders end-to-end, from intake and validation to ERP-ready orders. This page explains the difference and when each approach fits.

What are traditional OCR tools?

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) tools convert scanned documents or images into machine-readable text.

They are commonly used to:

digitise paper documents
extract raw text from PDFs or scans
enable search and archiving

OCR focuses on reading characters, not on understanding business context or processes.

What is Hyperfox?

Hyperfox is a B2B order automation platform that processes orders from multiple channels and formats, applies customer-specific business rules, and delivers validated, structured orders into ERP systems such as Business Central, SAP, Odoo, Exact and more integrations.

Hyperfox goes beyond text extraction by understanding how an order should look and behave in your operational systems.

Key differences at a glance

Dimension	Hyperfox	Traditional OCR tools
Primary purpose	End-to-end order automation	Text extraction
Input channels	Email, EDI, portal, field sales app, order forms	Scanned documents / PDFs
Output	Structured ERP-ready orders	Raw text or basic fields
Order line understanding	Yes	No
Customer-specific rules	Yes (pricing, products, units, delivery rules)	No
ERP integration	Direct order creation	Indirect / manual follow-up
Exception handling	Business-aware	Manual review
Role in workflow	Operational automation layer	Supporting capture tool

No items found.

Where OCR tools fit well

Traditional OCR tools can make sense when:

The goal is to digitise paper or scanned documents
Extracted text is reviewed and processed manually
There is no need to apply customer-specific pricing or rules
Documents are archived rather than operationally processed

In these cases, OCR is a useful enabling technology, but not a complete workflow solution.

Where Hyperfox is the better choice

Hyperfox is designed for operational order processing scenarios where:

Orders arrive via multiple channels (email, EDI, portals, forms, field sales)
Orders contain line items, units and customer-specific conditions
Validation against pricing, products and delivery rules is required
Orders must be created directly in ERP systems
Teams need control over exceptions and consistency at scale

Hyperfox focuses on orders as business objects, not just documents.

Common misconceptions

“OCR automates order processing.”
OCR extracts text. Order automation requires structure, validation and ERP integration.

“OCR accuracy improvements solve the problem.”
Even perfectly extracted text still needs matching, validation and business logic before becoming an order.

“Hyperfox replaces OCR.”
Hyperfox may use extraction techniques internally, but its value lies in orchestrating the full order process, not just reading documents.

Hyperfox vs OCR tools

Can OCR tools read order PDFs and Excel files?
Yes, they can extract text. They do not create structured orders or apply business rules.

Does Hyperfox extract data from PDFs and emails?
Yes — as part of a complete order automation flow that results in ERP-ready orders.

Can OCR and Hyperfox be used together?
In some environments, OCR can support document digitisation, while Hyperfox handles operational order automation.

Is OCR sufficient for B2B order automation?
In most cases, no. Orders require context, validation and integration beyond text extraction.